West Virginia Blue
The Best Blogging Community in West Virginia
Democratic politics, progressive policies, the good life and free living in Wild, Wonderful West Virginia.
Big Daddy Sen. Robert C. Byrd

Gov. Joe Manchin delivers on campaign promise

by: Clem Guttata

Thu Feb 12, 2009 at 05:00:12 AM EST


The pre-speech press totally missed this one. Other than on this here blog, no one else mentioned what turned out to be the first major policy element of last night's speech: Gov. Joe Manchin's energy plan.

Wabi Sabi already put up an great diary summarizing the speech. Manchin's section on energy deserves its own diary (emphasis mine):

One of the world's most-pressing issues is a growing demand for energy. Our nation needs West Virginia's energy resources to climb out of this recession. The opportunity for us to take the world stage in new energy development is now. Companies from around the globe are prepared to invest in West Virginia to make this kind of development a reality.

If we want to be a leader in renewable resources, we must commit to investing in the energy sources of the future. Throughout our history, our state has powered this nation.  West Virginians know energy better than anyone.  We must build upon our past successes and uncover even more efficient and cleaner energy sources.  

That means not just coal, but natural gas, and renewable resources, including wind, solar, hydro and biofuels.

Tonight, I am introducing a bill, called the Alternative and Renewable Energy Portfolio Act, which will put West Virginia at the forefront of new energy development. It sets a realistic timeframe for us to develop alternative and renewable energy resources.    

Beginning in 2015, at least 10 percent of the electric energy sold to electric customers must be generated by alternative or renewable energy sources. And, by 2025, we will require that 25 percent of electricity sold in West Virginia must be generated from alternative or renewable energy facilities.

Our bill will provide incentives to locate new alternative energy facilities in West Virginia, which will encourage the development of renewable energy resources and create jobs in the Mountain State.

This is within reach. With the growth of wind technology, by recycling waste heat from our industrial facilities, by cultivating biofuels like switchgrass, by harnessing the power of our rivers and the sun, and by expanding our clean coal efforts, we can meet our energy needs, create new jobs and improve our environment at the same time.  

Electricity doesn't always come from the power plant. Today we have the technology to generate electricity at our own homes and businesses, but there has been little incentive to invest in this technology because there is no way to get credit for the power you return to the electric grid.

My alternative and renewable energy bill will also require electric utility companies to provide net metering to residential, small business and industrial customers who generate their own electricity. This bill also requires the Public Service Commission to expand the availability of net metering to West Virginia electric customers.

It will encourage private investment in renewable energy sources, including solar, wind, biomass, hydropower, waste heat recovery and even landfill gas. It is another step toward expanding our state's energy portfolio.

We must also continue to keep in perspective the energy resources and technology we are using today. We can't simply abandon the way we live and generate electricity, but we must find newer and cleaner ways to produce energy with the abundance of resources we already have.  

It will take investment and research. We are on the verge of discovering cleaner, greener ways to use coal and we can continue to be a low-cost producer of energy if we believe in ourselves and embrace our energy expertise.

There's been a lot of debate about clean coal technology. Whether you agree or disagree with the concept, one thing is certain: We can improve the way we use coal and reduce the carbon that is released into the atmosphere.  

One new technology that has promise is carbon capturing. West Virginia can be at the forefront of this experimental method of capturing the carbon dioxide that comes from burning fossil fuels by finding ways to add value to this waste stream.

This week I will present a bill that will allow for permits for carbon sequestration projects. It will establish regulations for monitoring carbon sequestration sites and clarify ownership of the space in which the carbon is stored. Carbon sequestration is not the only solution to controlling power plant emissions, but we should explore its potential.

Energy independence must move from talk to action, and these proposals do that.  By broadening our definition of energy beyond just fossil fuels, we position ourselves to continue producing the nation's energy by any and all means.

These are all first steps that build on my vision for energy independence. They open the door to the future of new energy development in the Mountain State.

I'll have a lot more to say about the Alternative and Renewable Energy Portfolio Act (after I read it). For now, kudos to Gov. Manchin for following through on his campaign promise.

Clem Guttata :: Gov. Joe Manchin delivers on campaign promise
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
my first reactions (4.00 / 1)
This is only news because it is happening in West Virginia.

Compared to what many other states are doing, we are way behind. Depending on what is in the bill, this may or may not do much to catch us up.

The alternative energy targets look low to me. I'd really like to know what the current projections are, but I don't think it takes any action from the Gov. of W.Va. to hit those numbers... I think the industry is already on track to exceed those projections. (I'd really like some data here to check this gut feel.)

Manchin did not ask for anything from the coal companies. They're getting a big gift in clean coal and carbon sequestration technology investments. What do they give back in return?

What about enforcement of clean water regulations? What about meaningful original contour regulations? What about environmental impact assessment for MTR that includes alternative energy usage consideration? If any of these things are in his bill, they didn't get mentioned...

Still, doing something is almost certainly better than doing nothing.

Now it's time to pressure the legislature to make the bill stronger, not weaker.


I haven't read the plan yet, but (4.00 / 1)
many states, such as Ohio, offer incentives and other tax breaks in addition to the federal incentives for homeowners. What we need are ways to make solar and wind power affordable for homeowners. Take a few dollars from the "clean coal" and questionable carbon sequestration investments and give it to homeowners to help purchase  solar and wind power systems.

I find Manchin's mention of net-metering interesting. Net-metering has been available to West Virginians for a couple of years now.

What about a moratorium on MTR? What about Coal River Mountain? What about the DEP's unending supply of permits allowing further water degradation?

I find it particularly difficult to stomach Manchin's flowery statements about tourism, beautiful mountains, bringing people back to WV, and mountaineer pride, etc. when you know that the scourge of WV (MTR) is featured in Smithsonian magazine.


[ Parent ]
net-metering (4.00 / 1)
Last I looked into it, it was not available as a practical matter in the Eastern Panhandle for a consumer hookup. There was definitely room for improvement.

[ Parent ]
Net-metering (0.00 / 0)
is the ONLY incentive for homeowners offered by the state.
It took effect in March 2007.
http://www.dsireusa.org/librar...

[ Parent ]
yes, exactly!! (4.00 / 2)
And, that's a big part of the problem. It's the only incentive available and it's not a very generous one.

#1) The buy-back is limited to a net annual bill of zero, you cannot sell excess production to the utility company. If you already have an energy-efficient home, getting your power bill to zero is nice, but not as nice as getting a check from the power company.

#2) The size limit of 25kW for a system is small compared to most states. This could be an issue if you want to create a hybrid system of, for example, wind, solar, and geothermal.

#3) There's some other lovely wording protecting the utility companies in the utility contracts, too. Here's the one from Potomac Edison's Net Energy Metering Rider (see link at bottom of page for PDF):

Should the Company determine that an interconnection study is required; the Company will advise the customer of the estimated additional cost of performing such study. Upon payment by the customer of the estimated study costs, the Company will proceed with the interconnection study to determine if installation of the customer's electric generating facility will have significant impact on the Company's system.  

Should construction or upgrades of the Company's system be required in order to interconnect the customer's electric
generating facility, additional charges to cover costs incurred by the Company shall be determined by the Company
and paid by the customer.

What incentive do you think the utility company has to make it easy to install net metering?

#4) Not that it's coming close to being an issue yet, but total net metering is limited to 0.1% of utility's total load participation. I'm not completely clear on how this is implemented, but it sure sounds to me like I could be put in a situation where suddenly my net metering rebates are pro-rated because total net metering participation exceeds 0.1% of the utility's total load. That's a huge risk to take after I invest in a $20K-$30K system.

Put all of this together and the current situation looks like one designed to show that net metering is available while actually discouraging it. (When I was giving serious consideration a few years back to installing solar here in W.Va., these net metering rules was one of the things that put me off.)


[ Parent ]
WV gets a D- for net metering law (0.00 / 0)
There is a website that compares all the states who have net metering and gives them a grade based on its consumer usefullness or something to that effect and our state got a D-, whereas Md. got an A-, we can do a whole lot better.

[ Parent ]
more detailed response (4.00 / 1)
Ken Ward, Jr. has an even more substantive review, including a comparison to other state's plans.

Notice the clever juxtaposition phrasing which gives the "alternative" energy of gas-from-coal a real push. (0.00 / 0)
Revisit how he used the words ALTERNATIVE and RENEWABLE -

Beginning in 2015, at least 10 percent of the electric energy sold to electric customers must be generated by alternative or renewable energy sources. And, by 2025, we will require that 25 percent of electricity sold in West Virginia must be generated from alternative or renewable energy facilities.

Unless I'm mistaken, there is broad public misconception as to where the coal from our mountains is actually being used. I haven't looked all that closely at the numbers, but I believe that the overwhelming bulk of the coal from WV is being exported, and not being used to produce energy anywhere in the U.S. If I'm right, it means behind his clever use of the word "renewable", Manchin's is actually proposing to mandate the further advancement of his filthy, costly coal-to-gas pipe dream.


positioning is troubling (0.00 / 0)
I agree, Gov. Manchin is no environmentalist.

Gov. Manchin's primary motivation for this legislation appears to be gaining legitimacy for pushing coal-to-gas.

Still, it may create an opening for getting some good work done.


[ Parent ]
Premium Advertiser

blog advertising is good for you

Welcome!

( Home )
Menu

Click here to join!

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About
- About WVaBlue.com
- Send us news at wvablue@gmail.com
-  Subscribe in a reader

Advertisers


Support WVaBlue

Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Current CO2 level in the atmosphere

Proudly displaying the West Virginia Red, White, Blue, Green and Orange.

Join me at http://www.350.org


WVa Democrats
  • Sen. Jay Rockefeller
  • Sen. Joe Manchin III
  • Joe Manchin for Senate (2010/2012)
  • Rep. Nick Rahall (WV-03)
  • Secretary of State Natalie Tennant
  • Auditor Glen Gainer
  • Treasurer John Perdue
  • Agriculture Commissioner Gus Douglass
  • Attorney General Darrell V. McGraw
  • Senate President Earl Ray Tomblin, acting as Gov.
  • Declared Candidates
  • Jeff Kessler
  • John Perdue
  • Natalie Tennant
  • Earl Ray Tomblin
  • Rick Thompson

  • Copyright 2011 West Virginia Blue
    Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified.
    This site exists thanks to financial support from BlogPAC, dedicated volunteers and participation by members of this community. The views expressed at West Virginia Blue belong solely to their respective authors.
    Powered by: SoapBlox