West Virginia Blue
The Best Blogging Community in West Virginia
Democratic politics, progressive policies, the good life and free living in Wild, Wonderful West Virginia.
Big Daddy Sen. Robert C. Byrd

Martinsburg Journal and American Electric Power: Friends with Benefits?

by: Clem Guttata

Thu Jul 30, 2009 at 21:01:33 PM EDT


An article appearing in the Martinsburg Journal today by Naomi Smoot, "Officials: PATH not without benefits", quotes a single power company official touting the benefits of building one large transmission line compared to "30 lines at 138 kilovolts each."

This is like a mad doctor saying, don't complain about your healthy arm I'm about to amputate--just be happy I'm going to cut it off with one swipe of an axe instead of taking thirty slices with a meat cleaver.

From everything we've learned recently about the Martinsburg Journal corporate editorial stance, I don't know if it is fair to blame Naomi Smoot for how bad this article is. Whomever is responsible, it is clear example of how poorly a job much of the media in this state does of informing citizens.

What went wrong

Why did this story appear on this day in the paper? Best I can tell, it is because American Electric Power and Allegheny Power scheduled a media day--complete with helicopter rides--to showcase their PaTH joint venture. A paper with a better editor would use the media day as a launching pad for a much bigger picture on the project.

Does the story, as reported, have news value? No. The article is indistinguishable from a corporate press release. It only quotes a single source, an official from American Electric Power. It doesn't meet the Wikipedia standards for a neutral point of view. This article is much closer to advertisement copy than a newspaper story.

What would a news story on PaTH look like? There's a strong clue right there in the story:

The line has prompted concern for area residents and county officials. In all, 120 citizens, businesses and governmental agencies in Jefferson County have filed as interveners in the West Virginia Public Service Commission case to determine whether the line should be approved.

But, this paragraph raises more questions than it answers (Is 120 a lot or a little? Why are they concerned?). The article says nothing else about what the concerns are.

The entire remainder of the article are about benefits of building the transmission lines. Unstated is, inasmuch as those benefits even exist, they are almost exclusively benefits to the electrical utilities, not to residents of the newspaper's reading area!

The real news is the unprecedented number of "citizens, businesses and governmental agencies in Jefferson County [who] have filed as interveners." I bet there's never been more than a handful from Jefferson County before in any case at the PSC. Just imagine how many papers you could sell if you started telling the stories of these engaged local citizens.

Reader reaction

There is one small silver lining today. With 120 petitioned interveners in Jefferson County, the newspaper has an increasingly well informed audience. (With no thanks to the paper.)

The reader responses are priceless. Here's a flavor of the negative responses:

JournalReader - 07-30-09 6:04 AM

Why does the Journal roll over and play fetch for AEP? This reporter consistently is a mouthpiece for any corporate propaganda -- never seen her apply critical thinking skills to any story. In the age of shrinking newspaper revenues, the purchase of full page ads by AEP/PATH must be like manna.

FERCYOU - 07-30-09 6:34 AM

Lies. 1. This power will not be used in the eastern panhandle. PATH's own maps prove this. 2. Who cares how many 138kV lines it would take to equal PATH? If the east coast provides its own renewable power, we won't need ANY new transmission lines (AKA extension cords). 3. Height of towers. I guess they didn't bother looking at their own application to the PSC. Tower heights are much higher in the application. 4. Nothing can "blend" 180 foot towers into the landscape. Get real! 5. Cost = over $1.8 billion, with 14.3% profit for Allegheny and AEP paid for by you. 6. 140 intervenors from Jefferson Co. 7. These lines are creating a new 275 foot right of way adjacent to existing lines, hardly "a couple of feet". 8. PATH land agents are busy in Jefferson Co. trying to swindle folks out of their land for a song. Just say NO.

jbchris - 07-30-09 8:41 AM

ChEwNo, you are exactly right about the extension cord concept, that is precisely what PATH is, a huge extension cord supplying dirty coal fired electricity to the eastern seaboard where they don't want it, does that make sense to you? Renewable energy systems both large and small will solve our nations energy needs now and into the future. Why invest millions in an obsolete technology? We should build renewable systems that are clean alternatives and wait for the smart grid technology to be instituted in order to plan for the nations future electrical needs. Don't be fooled by fear and free advertising as reported in the Journal, use your mind and embrace the future of electrical generation.

Sesame - 07-30-09 4:04 PM

First: I have documented all comments by Mr. Allen Staggers, Allegheny Energy Spokesperson, stated in past Journal Articles. Now I will update/add Mr. Gogol's comments. In the near future I will publicly address the comments.

Second. PATH representatives are telling on one side of the story,not the whole story, which equates to lying,is very poor business ethics and is not within any code of conduct I have ever worked under either in private or government industry.

Examples of half truth or one side of the story. Mr. Gogol states that they are in Jefferson County simply asking for rights to survey. He fails to mention surveying/taking core samples requires bringing heavy equipment onto the property and drilling down as much as 30 feet. Huge disruption to the property and homeowner. Running tandem to the existing 500 and 138 volt lines is considered as of no consequence, when in fact it now increases the electric field to 1403 kilo-volts of electricity. No Issues?

houner - 07-30-09 6:06 PM

The so-called "fact box" (actually a xerox of a power company press release) contains the statement that "80 percent Amount of the project that will parallel existing 500 kilovolt power lines." Besides making absolutely no sense grammatically, this statement is not a "fact". Very little of the PATH line will parallel existing lines. I all cases where that happens, the PATH line will require an additional 200 right of way. There is at least one lie in the "fact box." Many more in the quotes from power company hacks.

Maybe it's time to update that old saying by Mark Twain: "If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're mis-informed." If you read newspaper Internet comments, you're un-mis-informed.

Clem Guttata :: Martinsburg Journal and American Electric Power: Friends with Benefits?
Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Note in the Journal article (4.00 / 2)
how Ms. Smoot lets the power company people go on and on about their view of the larger issues and their technology, etc.  Whenever reporters talk to citizens, they focus on the NIMBY issues of viewsheds and health concerns, and not the larger questions of whether the power lines are really needed or if the power lines will really solve any of the problems that the power companies describe.  

So, as I said in my last post, readers get the idea that the power companies see the big picture and have all the facts, while the dumb, narrow-minded citizens are just NIMBYs.  Articles like the one in the Journal create their own circular logic that effectively keeps the truth out of their stories.  This is exactly what the power companies want people to see: AEP/Allegheny's omnipotence versus the narrow hysterical reactions of a few malcontents.

The fact is that West Virginia citizens are extremely well informed about the issue of the need for PATH and the threat the line poses to real investment in the US's energy future.  You just won't read anything about this in the state's newspapers.  Thank goodness for the Internet.


PATH (0.00 / 1)
Except for today the Journal's coverage has mostly been heavily slanted against PATH, and they're a heavily Republican slanted paper.  That said, is opposing PATH a progressive issue now?  Seems like more of a NIMBY problem to me.  The arguments against are either of the "think of the children" and "powerlines cause cancer" type, or they're of the "we don't want powerlines going through our state if we aren't getting any of the electricity" variety.  "Powerlines cause cancer" is woo coming from the same anti-science crowd who think aspartame and cell phones cause cancer.  The other argument against is just plain NIMBYism and has no merit either, since PATH will definitely bring good paying jobs to WV.  Somebody has to build and maintain transmission lines, and Allegheny Energy has a yard right here in Martinsburg.

I'm all for it.  NIMBY does not = Progressive.  Either we build and develop as much new energy sources and transmission and distribution infrastructure as possible, or else the alternative is rolling blackouts and more coal.


wholet... You have fallen for the power companies' PR play.. (4.00 / 3)
See my comment above. Then do some homework on the Internet about what is really happening. Here's a good place to start:
http://calhounpowerline.wordpr...  You won't find much NIMBY there.  What you will find is documentation about the history of AEP/Allegheny/PJM's attempt to foist obsolete and expensive investments to lock in coal-fired electricity on the east coast for the next 30 years.

This isn't just a NIMBY issue.  You haven't been reading much on The Power Line and WV Citizens Against PATH if you think only NIMBYs oppose PATH, TrAIL, MAPP and the Susquehanna Roseland line in New Jersey.  You need to do your homework.  PATH is about the future of the energy economy in the eastern US.


[ Parent ]
Your ignorance of the issue is showing (3.25 / 4)
(1) PATH will bring no jobs to West Virginia; the generation plant doesn't need to be built, since they are using the John Amos COAL-FIRED plant near St. Albans, they are using "land agents" from other parts of the country, not locals, and the crews that will actually build the line will come from elsewhere (see the TrAIL line - some of the same power companies). In fact, PATH really doesn't make any claims about jobs, so where'd you get that argument?

(2) "[O]r else the alternative is ... more coal." See (1). There is nothing about PATH that promotes new energy sources. In fact, PATH is intended to carry coal-based electricity to New Jersey - and New Jersey's OWN master plan calls for local generation using renewable sources! The WV Coal Association supports PATH, because, as the president of the association wrote in a letter to the WV Public Service Commission,

"Enhanced transmission capacity helps increase the amount of low-cost, coalfired generation dispatched into the regional grid. This helps preserve the future of existing power plants already on line, justifies additional investment in these plants and increases the likelihood that new, clean-coal electric fired generation will be constructed in the state.

Additionally, the activation of this new line could also lead to an increase in West Virginia coal production ...

(3) The Journal has been a LITTLE BIT more evenhanded about covering the issue, but for instance, in the 3-part series on the issue, two addressed the public's concerns - and included AEP/Allegheny talking points; the third part was all from the power companies' perspective and included no citizen comments (just as in the story we're talking about today).

(4) You sneer dismissively at the argument, "Think of the children." Condescending prick. Have you even looked at any of the science? The people who are expressing quite reasonable fears for their own and their families' health have been burning up the Internet searching for mainstream, accepted studies that demonstrate the connection. Do you really trust the power companies to tell the truth? I guess you missed the day that tobacco company executives lied under oath before Congress about the health risks of tobacco, and got out of all your Enron stocks before it turned out to be a giant scam, and don't mind that the banks who got bailed out last fall went ahead and paid billions of dollars in bonuses to the idiots that screwed up. Or maybe you're just a troll who actually works for AEP or Allegheny.

(5) How in the world can you simply dismiss the argument that WV isn't getting any of the benefits? The power companies themselves acknowledge we won't get any of the electricity. They claim it will help our reliability and prevent blackouts - which is a lie. Go read "What's Wrong With the Electric Grid?" from Industrial Physicist magazine, which uses science to explain why long-distance transmission of electricity will actually increase risks to the grid.

After you've done a quarter - no, a tenth of the research that these citizens have done, come on back and try again.


[ Parent ]
Owner = Ogden Nutting (4.00 / 2)
'nuff said.

Urinal defies public will gives free advertising to the rich (4.00 / 2)
They don't call it the Urinal for nothin', the irony in all this is that the public, the ratepayers are paying for all the PR hype put out by the utilities and most of them don't even realize it.  I think the PATH should pay for everyone's expenses including the intervenors and their expert witnesses, only then will the process be a fair one.

Premium Advertiser

blog advertising is good for you

Welcome!

( Home )
Menu

Click here to join!

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About
- About WVaBlue.com
- Send us news at wvablue@gmail.com
-  Subscribe in a reader

Advertisers


Support WVaBlue

Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Current CO2 level in the atmosphere

Proudly displaying the West Virginia Red, White, Blue, Green and Orange.

Join me at http://www.350.org


WVa Democrats
  • Sen. Jay Rockefeller
  • Sen. Joe Manchin III
  • Joe Manchin for Senate (2010/2012)
  • Rep. Nick Rahall (WV-03)
  • Secretary of State Natalie Tennant
  • Auditor Glen Gainer
  • Treasurer John Perdue
  • Agriculture Commissioner Gus Douglass
  • Attorney General Darrell V. McGraw
  • Senate President Earl Ray Tomblin, acting as Gov.
  • Declared Candidates
  • Jeff Kessler
  • John Perdue
  • Natalie Tennant
  • Earl Ray Tomblin
  • Rick Thompson

  • Copyright 2011 West Virginia Blue
    Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified.
    This site exists thanks to financial support from BlogPAC, dedicated volunteers and participation by members of this community. The views expressed at West Virginia Blue belong solely to their respective authors.
    Powered by: SoapBlox