West Virginia Blue
The Best Blogging Community in West Virginia
Democratic politics, progressive policies, the good life and free living in Wild, Wonderful West Virginia.
Big Daddy Sen. Robert C. Byrd

Resource Rich, Dirt Poor: Time for a New Deal in Appalachia

by: Clem Guttata

Wed Sep 16, 2009 at 14:33:32 PM EDT


By Clem Guttata

This diary originally appeared on West Virginia Blue on June 07, 2007. It's just as timely today as it was 2+ years ago.

I agree with Erik Reece of Lexington, KY. It's time for a 'new deal' for Appalachia (h/t to va dare for the link):

A form of strip mining called mountaintop removal has ripped apart all of the ridgelines that surround this forest, leaving miles of lifeless gray plateaus, lunar wastelands. Mountaintop removal entails the blasting of entire summits to rubble in an effort to reach, as quickly and inexpensively as possible, thin seams of bituminous coal. Trees, topsoil and sandstone are dumped into the valleys below. More than 1,000 miles of streams have been buried in this way, and an Environmental Protection Agency study found that 95 percent of headwater streams near mines have been contaminated by heavy metals leeching from the sites.

When it comes to mountaintop removal, a certain fatalism seems to take hold in Appalachia -- the coal companies are too powerful, some politicians are corrupt, the regulators won't regulate and the news media don't care. But we cannot give up on rehabilitating Appalachia.

Erik Reece continues outlining not only the problems we face, but a hopeful future for new solutions as well.

Appalachia's land is dying. Its fractured communities show the typical symptoms of hopelessness, including OxyContin abuse rates higher than anywhere in the country. Meanwhile, 22 states power houses and businesses with Kentucky coal. The people of central and southern Appalachia have relinquished much of their natural wealth to the rest of the country and have received next to nothing in return.

To right these wrongs, first we need federal legislation that will halt the decapitation of mountains and bring accountability to an industry that is out of control. Then we need a New Deal for Appalachia that would expand the Appalachian Regional Reforestation Initiative, or create a similar program, to finally return some of the region's lost wealth in the form of jobs and trees, rebuilt topsoil and resuscitated communities.


Financing should come from a carbon tax on Appalachian coal bought and burned by utility companies across the country -- a tax that would also discourage the wasteful emissions of greenhouse gases. Such a project would educate and employ an entire generation of foresters and forest managers, who would be followed by locally owned wood-product industries and craftsmen like Patrick Angel's brother Mike, who makes much sought-after hardwood chairs just like ones his grandfather fashioned.

We know that our species, and most other species, will survive only in a future that burns no coal or oil. The question now is whether we have the nerve to get there before the world's oldest mountains are gone.

I couldn't agree more. Let's start investing financial resources in sustainable development. The extraction economy has been a disaster for this region--liquid coal is not the answer. Sustainable energy solutions are sustainable economic solutions.

Flickr photo credit: Erik Reece by Kentuckians For The Commonwealth

Clem Guttata :: Resource Rich, Dirt Poor: Time for a New Deal in Appalachia
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
do it! (0.00 / 0)
"Let's start investing financial resources in sustainable development"....ive said it before..put your money where your mouth is... mortgage it all and start a frickin wind farm...dont wait for the government to do it!...

I've looked into it (0.00 / 0)
Right now the WV code for net metering is really antagonistic to such an enterprise--the playing field is stacked strongly in favor of the incumbent utility.

Otherwise, I would be generating wind energy and, on many a day, would provide more than enough for myself and all of my immediate neighbors. (I'm close enough to the top of a ridge line at a spot well suited for wind power production.)


[ Parent ]
Replay of this morning Washington Journal on CSPAN (4.00 / 3)
retired West Virginia coal miner laid it all out. Out state is surrounded by those who want to take the state apart. The water is poisoned, the habitat unique to this are is being destroyed by mountain top removal, and the slurry pond and ash pits that devastated  that community in Tennessee can be mitigated by better technology.

NFTT: Support My Team or I Will Dance

I've always found contrarianism to be tedious, and I don't want to be the resident contrarian, (0.00 / 0)
but a new New Deal is incredibly unrealistic. I'm all for the planting of hardwoods, the abolition of MTR mining, and sustainable energy solutions, but to try to portray them as the answer to "fractured communities show[ing] the typical symptoms of hopelessness, including OxyContin abuse rates higher than anywhere in the country" is, well, insulting.

I hope this can be taken in the spirit in which it's given, but to say that wind turning a turbine or sun shining on a photovoltaic cell will result in the same or more man-hours as mining coal is a non-starter and automatically identifies the proponent as naive at best and it actually hurts the cause.

Again, the planting of hardwoods and rehabilitation of the soil is crucial, but any economic benefits from hardwoods would be at least two generations out and a value-added timber industry is more tumultuous and risky than the restaurant industry as any resident of western North Carolina will tell you.

And as far as the new New Deal, the TVA is literally a disaster in some respects, and can you imagine how much time and energy the Obama administration would spend defending the Resettlement Administration (Seriously, the Bauhaus of this Greenbelt, Md. building would be the symbol of resistance for the Tea Bagging set) even though that would actually be a smart and humane solution if done in a limited and voluntary fashion.

So, with altruistic constructive criticism, let me suggest that we take extra care in vetting our arguments so that we'll be taken serious which will help ensure that we get at least some of what we know to be right and just accomplished.


Bob, I quite agree (0.00 / 0)
I've always found contrarianism to be tedious...

You're so right. ;^>

...but to say that wind turning a turbine or sun shining on a photovoltaic cell will result in the same or more man-hours as mining coal is a non-starter...

To say it like that is a nonstarter. To say it closer to reality would mean pointing out what would create the jobs  is not sun or the wind, but rather it is the industries that manufacture the wind turbines and solar panel cells, the jobs in the installation of smarter grids to connect the power generation to the people and in the engineering and related design services to build even more efficient energy solutions and the jobs in maintaining the systems.  If it's about hours of labor mining coal, then we should all be opposed to mountaintop removal for that basis alone. Green energy jobs would be good jobs that have a future. Coal is not an infinite resource and if we're not planning for the future, there won't be one in Appalachia. As Clem has often pointed out, the reason coal barons pay a decent wage isn't because they're decent employers, it's because the labor base is so small in the nation's sacrifice zone.

...automatically identifies the proponent as naive at best and it actually hurts the cause.

Ah, the not-so-subtle dig where the commenter gets to have it both ways by being insulting to the proponents of the idea and then claiming later he wasn't being insulting all sisnce it was carefully couched in the best David Broderesque concern trolling. ::golf clap::

Review a few acounts of the green energy economy taking place in other states and it's clear there's nothing naive at all about putting forward a green economy for job creation compared to the job destruction that is behind MTR.



When a man embarks upon a crime, he is morally guilty of any other crime which may spring from it. Sherlock Holmes.


[ Parent ]
First of all, "trolling" - concern or otherwise - necessarily requires disingenuousness, and I'm not guilty of that. (0.00 / 0)
 
OK, so I looked at the proposed Shepherds Flat Wind Farm in Oregon which would have 303 turbines, produce enough power for a substantial portion of Kanawha County's total usage, and be the largest wind farm in the world. And after construction would employ "about 25 when operational".

I'll repeat that: 303 wind turbines will generate only 25 long-term jobs. It's only common sense that it would be that way, and to try to portray it in any other way is insulting the intelligence of the listener.

...it is the industries that manufacture the wind turbines and solar panel cells, the jobs in the installation of smarter grids to connect the power generation to the people and in the engineering and related design services to build even more efficient energy solutions and the jobs in maintaining the systems.

Almost none of that is going to have an economic impact on the communities of the coal fields. Getting these types of manufacturing jobs here in WV is a long shot at best, the installation of smarter grids will be done by existing power company jobs, and professionals in "engineering and related design services" aren't exactly your average OC junkie or prevalent in the communities that are fractured by the negative impacts of MTR mining.

We've agreed that one of the biggest reasons we won't be getting a public option in the health insurance reform bill is that we didn't sell it well. Let's not keep making that mistake.


[ Parent ]
Bob (0.00 / 0)
I'll repeat that: 303 wind turbines will generate only 25 long-term jobs.

To provide enough power for the equivalent of one county. That's not counting all of the other windfarms that could be built in the state to provide power to other parts of state and the nation.

Regarding manufacturing, if the state and federal govt. invested in job retraining to provide every coal worker a good paying job in the green economy as Al Gore has proposed, then those manufacturing and engineering jobs could be in West Virginia. I've long proposed the state make the investments in tax incentives and education and university research to turn West Virginia into a renewable energy center the way the Research Triangle of North Carolina is a biotech and pharmaceutical center. To say the people of West Virginia are incapable of the work is insulting to them.

We've agreed that one of the biggest reasons we won't be getting a public option in the health insurance reform bill is that we didn't sell it well. Let's not keep making that mistake.  

I don't recall us ever agreeing to any such thing. I think we've disagreed how strongly the public supports the public option in polling. I also think we're going to end up with healthcare reform that does include a public option. The Max Baucus plan that you had earlier touted is Dead On Arrival. Jay Rockefeller is not going to revive the corpse of the Baucus plan. Rather he's going to push for a public option plan.


When a man embarks upon a crime, he is morally guilty of any other crime which may spring from it. Sherlock Holmes.


[ Parent ]
Where in the hell are we going to put 303 wind turbines in this state?! (0.00 / 0)
Are you saying we'll be able to find locations for all of the turbines necessary to power WV? See, this is what I'm talking about - that's absurd and instantly discrediting.

I've long proposed the state make the investments in tax incentives and education and university research to turn West Virginia into a renewable energy center the way the Research Triangle of North Carolina is a biotech and pharmaceutical center.

Absolutely. And one of the first projects should be sugar cane. Few people realize that it depends on annual average rainfall, not necessarily a warm climate, and WV has more than enough annual rainfall to grow it.

To say the people of West Virginia are incapable of the work is insulting to them.

I didn't say that the people of WV aren't qualified, I said that the citizens of the coal fields, the people in the original post the sustainable energy are supposed to help, aren't.

It was either you or Clem that agreed that we haven't sold the public option as well as we should have. If it wasn't you I apologize. And I never touted the Baucus bill, I said that we cannot afford to quash any bill that doesn't include a public option.

It is beyond me why progressive bloggers are continuing to claim that we're going to get a public option - seriously, it's not going to happen - instead of trying to lobby for concepts that are actually attainable this year.

J-Rock will continue to pound the drum for a public option right up to the moment when he caves and reluctantly votes for the bill in it's final form. Politically, he has to do that, but we don't.


[ Parent ]
Bob (0.00 / 0)
I didn't say that the people of WV aren't qualified, I said that the citizens of the coal fields, the people in the original post the sustainable energy are supposed to help, aren't

If we aren't making the investments in retraining the people of the coal fields then we are doing them an even greater disservice than to make their lands a national sacrifice zone. Those are the very people that Al Gore spoke of training for the new jobs. I do think they're capable of retraining. Of all our natural resources, our people are the most valuable.

The assumption of the number of turbines and their size necessary to power a county assumes technology is static. It's certainly not especially if we invested as much on green technology as we'd squander on developing "clean coal" technologies on a finite resource like coal.

It is beyond me why progressive bloggers are continuing to claim that we're going to get a public option - seriously, it's not going to happen - instead of trying to lobby for concepts that are actually attainable this year.

J-Rock will continue to pound the drum for a public option right up to the moment when he caves and reluctantly votes for the bill in it's final form. Politically, he has to do that, but we don't.  

So we should "cave" instead of holding our elected officials' feet to the fire to push them to do the right thing?

I guess you missed the recent speeches by Obama on the public option. If we don't have his back and Rockefeller's back on this after pushing for it, what is the point of being activists? Those of us who wanted a national health care system for everyone, like Canada's or Britain's, already compromised by accepting a public option plan.



When a man embarks upon a crime, he is morally guilty of any other crime which may spring from it. Sherlock Holmes.


[ Parent ]
we won't get anything if we give up before we try (4.00 / 1)
MTR is a net negative. Personally, I think it is disingenuous to talk only about MTR jobs and not talk about the significant negative effects of MTR. That is cherry-picking data--it presents a highly distorted picture.

Studies show that the costs to MTR communities dwarf the benefits from MTR jobs.

There's the framing... MTR employs a few people, most of whom drive long distances for the jobs because MTR makes nearby communities uninhabitable. Once the MTR owners ride out of town with their ill-gotten gains, what is left is spent land, poverty, and reduced life expectancies.

When residential or commercial solar and wind are put in place, when MTR miners are employed for reclamation work, what is left is productive land that is attractive to other economic development.

I don't know how much you've been paying attention, but it looks very much like we are going to get a public option. The majority of the public is in favor of it just like the majority of West Virginians want to diversity the W.Va. economy.

I disagree that the problem is selling the ideas. Progressive ideas are popular.

I think the problem is creating a power base to pressure our politicians to do their job of representing the people, not corporations. Big Coal has a death grip on political power in this state, sniping away at any alternative is exactly what they want to see happen.


[ Parent ]
I've been paying quite a bit of attention and that's why I know that ANY health care bill is questionable, much less a public option. (0.00 / 0)
From Gallup yesterday:

Despite the fact that half of Americans support the idea of new healthcare legislation, many fewer are convinced that President Obama's healthcare reform plan can expand coverage and maintain quality while not increasing middle-class taxes, and that the plan can be paid for mostly through cost savings in the existing healthcare system.

The poll suggests that support could drop if Americans come to believe the middle class will be asked to bear an increased burden in terms of higher taxes, higher medical costs, or diminished quality in order to expand healthcare coverage to those who currently lack it.

With 50% of Americans backing healthcare reform in principle, it is unclear whether the president has enough of a public mandate at this point to convince reluctant members of Congress to vote for healthcare reform. Equally unclear is whether public support for healthcare reform will grow or decrease in the coming weeks as more details of the plan are hammered out in Congress. But as Congress continues to do its work, the president and other supporters of healthcare reform have an opportunity to continue making their case to Americans, and to allay some of the public's doubts about what their vision of reform would accomplish and at what cost.

And if you think I'm happy about that, you're very much mistaken. But it does no good to continue to deny reality and allow the powerful forces arrayed against us to get an edge by discrediting our 'facts' right off the bat.

Both health care reform and sustainable energy battles are street fights, and not having bullet-proof facts and unimpeachable statistics guarantees defeat.


[ Parent ]
Premium Advertiser

blog advertising is good for you

Welcome!

( Home )
Menu

Click here to join!

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About
- About WVaBlue.com
- Send us news at wvablue@gmail.com
-  Subscribe in a reader

Advertisers


Support WVaBlue

Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Current CO2 level in the atmosphere

Proudly displaying the West Virginia Red, White, Blue, Green and Orange.

Join me at http://www.350.org


WVa Democrats
  • Sen. Jay Rockefeller
  • Sen. Joe Manchin III
  • Joe Manchin for Senate (2010/2012)
  • Rep. Nick Rahall (WV-03)
  • Secretary of State Natalie Tennant
  • Auditor Glen Gainer
  • Treasurer John Perdue
  • Agriculture Commissioner Gus Douglass
  • Attorney General Darrell V. McGraw
  • Senate President Earl Ray Tomblin, acting as Gov.
  • Declared Candidates
  • Jeff Kessler
  • John Perdue
  • Natalie Tennant
  • Earl Ray Tomblin
  • Rick Thompson

  • Copyright 2011 West Virginia Blue
    Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified.
    This site exists thanks to financial support from BlogPAC, dedicated volunteers and participation by members of this community. The views expressed at West Virginia Blue belong solely to their respective authors.
    Powered by: SoapBlox