West Virginia Blue
The Best Blogging Community in West Virginia
Democratic politics, progressive policies, the good life and free living in Wild, Wonderful West Virginia.
Big Daddy Sen. Robert C. Byrd

Interview with Laura Steepleton of Climate Ground Zero

by: heath_harrison

Wed Oct 07, 2009 at 05:22:55 AM EDT


(With Climate Ground Zero tree sitters back in the news, this is a good time to revisit how the last tree sit went. Here's an exclusive interview that Heath Harrison did with Laura Steepleton. There's also an essential video with two of the contractor security guards that provides a real sense of how Blankenship was saying one thing in public while doing another thing in private. - promoted by Clem Guttata)

by heath_harrison

This is the first installment in a series of interviews planned on the topic of mountaintop removal.

On Aug. 31, Laura Steepleton and Nick Stocks, activists with environmental group Climate Ground Zero, were arrested following a tree-sit at Massey Energy's Edward mine, a mountaintop removal mine in  Raleigh County, West Virginia.

The two spent six days in platforms 90 feet from the ground in an effort to halt the blasting endangering the nearby community of Petry Bottom. In addition to drawing national attention to the destructive effects of mountaintop removal, the protesters demanded Massey pay heath care and home repair costs for residents affected by the blasting.

The protest was part a larger campaign of civil disobedience and direct action events occurring in Appalachia, as local and national pressure to end mountaintop removal has grown.

The following is an excerpt of a conversation I had with Steepleton a few weeks after her release (adapted for print):

Q - How long did you originally intend to remain in the tree?

L.S. - I intended to stay until I was out of food and water.

Nick had to be back home by the 1st, so he made plans to get down by Monday. We had a rope connecting both the trees, called a traverse, and I went over the night before and talked to him. I told him I was fine to be up there by myself. I took all of his extra water and food, which left me with enough for a week.

My plan was to be up there for as long as possible. Our support had been arrested already, so I knew there was no chance of resupply.

After Nick got down Monday morning, they upped the harassment - which I totally expected -and brought the chainsaws out and put them at the bottom of the tree.

I kind of turned it into a game whenever they would do some sort of harassment. The first couple of nights, they would be banging on buckets  - and whatever they could bang on.  I just turned it into entertainment. We had a drum circle, just to show them it wasn't going to bother me.

On Monday, they brought these obnoxious sirens out, and that lasted for a couple of hours. By then, Sergeant Smith had already come out and arrested Nick and left.

They realized the sirens weren't affecting me, so two loggers walked up on the berm.  One miner kept saying, "They're going to come down and start chopping down trees."

I said, " You're not really going to do that you wouldn't endanger me like that."

And they were like,  'That's what you think.'

So I said, "Well, if the state trooper was here, you couldn't do this."

And they made the comment, "Oh, we know the trooper's not
here right now and he's not on his way. We came in through the back entrance and Massey's ordered us to be here. It's their property we can do what we want."

Both of the loggers had come down and most of the security had gone up to the berm out of the way. One logger started spiking up the tree that Nick was in.

At that point, I thought I needed to get out onto the traverse. That way, he couldn't cut that tree down, because I would be on the rope connecting the two trees.

I went to do that and, as I was setting it up, a miner said, "You better hurry up and cut that line, or she's going to get out on that line."

He looked at me and said, "I don't care if she's on that line. She's got a harness on. She's not going to fall."

It's true I wouldn't have fallen. I would've swung a little bit. Being that the line is a dynamic rope and stretched quite a bit, it probably would have snapped and then hit the tree.

At that point, I thought, "Well, maybe this guy's not bluffing. If I go out on this rope, he's going to cut it and not care if I swing a little bit."

And, at that point, trees started coming down around me, so I just said, "OK, I'll get down.

Q - Did you have any interaction with any major Massey officials or objectives during your time there?

L.S. - No, there was a Massey helicopter that flew over on the first day and the last day. I was told - but I still haven't verified it - that [Massey CEO] Don Blankenship was in the helicopter the last day.

It wouldn't surprise me that he would want to be there to see all the different tactics they were employing when I was the only one up there, and that he'd want to see trees falling down beside me.

Q - Do you think Blankenship wanted to have you down before his big Labor Day bash?

L.S. - Probably. The one thing I definitely wanted was to still be in that tree for that big Labor Day bash.

I think that 's why they were stepping it up. He knew he had to go and do this.

We watched it live on Internet, and he mentioned "the crazy enviro-nuts" that strap themselves to machines and hang out in trees - and how we're the real threats to America and giving more jobs to China, which is increasing pollution.

Q - What sort of reaction have you received after getting back?

L.S. - It's really great how it's drawn a lot of local support. We've had a lot of locals come out because of it. They were really excited by the fact that we were actually able to hold ground and stop them for a week.  It's been creating more locals to speak out, which is great.

And those two security guards coming out and doing that interview - that made me really, really happy.  I couldn't believe that amount of support. Those guys were my heroes.

More people walked off the job because they were getting overworked. They were pulling 17-hour shifts and not getting briefed on what was going on until they got there.

A lot of them lived two hours away, so they'd get on these 17-hour shifts and had to be back in six hours. A lot of them didn't even have time to go home. They were pulling over on the side of the road, sleeping and coming back.  

Q  - What was the interaction like between you and the Massey employees?

L.S. - I had conversations with miners every night.  They'd go on break around two in the morning and come out and harass us.  

The first night, I came out after they kept saying, "We know you're awake."

So I pulled over my tarp and said, "I'm here. Let's have a conversation."

It was kind of funny, because for a couple minutes there was dead silence. They couldn't say the nasty things to my face, that they were saying when I had the tarp pulled in front of me. But then it eventually stepped up.

By the third night, I was actually able to have somewhat of a conversation.

They kept mentioning how their side of the story never gets told, and how we're just full of propaganda and get all of this media attention.  

At that point, I asked, "OK, what is your story? I am talking to media. What do you want to say? Just let me know. "

Q - And how did they respond to that?

L.S.  - Basically their response was, "There is nothing here but coal. You are taking away our jobs by doing this and causing our kids to not have food on their plates."

My response to them was, "It's going to take time and, believe it or not, I don't want to come in and take your jobs way from you. I don't want to see a lot of people laid off."

I asked, "Don't you want a safer future for your children - a healthy future and to be able to stay in West Virginia? And what are you going to do anyway in 20 years when there's no more coal left?"

Q-  Was it hard to discuss a long-time scenario with them?

L.S. - That was totally it. Their response is, " By them I'll be retired."  I think the mentality is that they'll be able to send their kids somewhere else to have a better future.

But some of them did ask, "Where are these jobs? We would be willing to transfer, but they're not here. "

That's the frustrating part. I can't sit there and say, "If there were windmills, you could go right to work." It's not going to happen overnight, with a great windmill farm up on Coal River Mountain.

You could still have jobs. There's tons of real reclamation that could be done on these mountains. If mountaintop removal ended tomorrow, you've still got all of the heavy machinery. Let's start actually doing a better job reclaiming.

But where does that funding come from? It should come from the coal companies, in my opinion. Massey's making a ton of money. They should be able to spend a couple million dollars in actual reclamation.

They asked, "Do you think we should just live off of welfare?" I think they should get government should support them until there's a transition into different jobs here.

And I let them know that there people working on that. We're not just a bunch of people getting arrested. There are other people here doing so many things to help bring different forms of economy and alternative energy into this area.

I didn't make a lot of leeway. It was kind of like talking to a brick wall, for the most part. In their mind, Massey treats them fine.

They're making 20-something dollars an hour, and that's the best paying job you can get in this area, just coming out of high school.

They've been fed a bunch of information from their side, which they believe to be legit. I think, even if they don't believe it, they just want to believe it so bad.

Q - It's going to require such a paradigm shift in this state, from the political leaders - and everyone - to change this mentality.

They're just not thinking long-term about any of this stuff.

L.S.  - And that's what I kept trying to tell them. I don't hate you I want to have a conversation with you. I want you to help end this, too.  And help find yourselves better jobs, and make it so your children can stay in West Virginia and enjoy this beautiful place.

The company doesn't care about them. I'm not pro-coal in any way, but you if want to talk job loss, look at the jobs that were lost - 80,000 jobs - when they started to do mountaintop removal.

It only takes about 25 to 30 people for a mountaintop removal site, site because of all the heavy machinery - so more profit for the company; they use more machines and less people.
That cut a lot of jobs when they shipped it over to mountaintop removal from underground mining.

Q - In addition to civil disobedience and direct action, what sort of work have you been doing as part of your community organizing?

L.S.  - I've been photo documenting the damages to people's homes, talking to them about how the blasting has impacted them.  They've been blasting this area for the past three or four years, but it's really moved on top of this community in the past year.

We have this great community that's addressing this problem from all different kinds of angles - every legal route from lobbying, writing letters and talking with community members and then direct civil disobedience action.

Climate Ground Zero's campaign is ongoing. For more information on how to get involved and what you can do to help, visit www.climategroundzero.com.

Coming next in this series: Ken Hechler

heath_harrison :: Interview with Laura Steepleton of Climate Ground Zero
Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Heath (4.00 / 3)
Fantastic post. Well done. Kudos to Laura and the others too for their activism.

When a man embarks upon a crime, he is morally guilty of any other crime which may spring from it. Sherlock Holmes.

Is this kind of activism helpful? (0.00 / 1)
While I admire Ms. Steepleton's devotion to her obviously deeply held committments, I feel this kind of protest is misguided and non-productive.  The fact is that coal companies are engaged in a legal activity(no matter how much the activists wish that were not true).  If coal companies cause damage or fail to follow laws, citizens who are harmed by illegal activities have a great many remedies both legal and civil.  As Mr. Lovett and Mr. Teaney have proven repeatedly the courts are a very effective recourse.  The kind of criminal activities which occurred at Edwight and Twilight certainly do not need to be encouraged.  For one thing they are unsafe.  There are at least two documented fatalities which have resulted from tree-sitting incidents.(see wikipedia for link).  Secondly this kind of confrontational action leads to additional confrontation and will in my opinion eventually result in violence. (something I think the activists are hoping for at times), third they represent a morally insupportable action.  I think condemnation would be universal if these activists burned an office building down.  By stopping major mining equipment such as the dragline, they have committed just as much damage.  I would hope that even people passionately opposed to mountain top mining would agree that in a civil society such tactics can not be allowed.  There is nothing wrong with advocating a cause or attempting to change laws.  When activists resort to illegal activities they delegitimize their cause.

viscount coal (4.00 / 2)
Right. What the hell was Rosa Parks thinking when she engaged in that illegal activity on that bus? She certain delegitimized the entire civil rights movement. Thank goodness her kind of illegal activism against the lawful bus system was stopped.

When a man embarks upon a crime, he is morally guilty of any other crime which may spring from it. Sherlock Holmes.

[ Parent ]
Does that make Mike Roselle Martin Luther King? (0.00 / 1)
A couple of thoughts: First, in my opinion comparing the civil rights struggle to these actions is more than a little overblown (see comparison in title).  Second if Rosa Parks would have slashed the tires and chained herself to the bus, it probably would have turned out a lot different.

[ Parent ]
viscount coal (4.00 / 2)
On the contrary, this is the civil rights struggle of our time. Are we going to allow rich people to destroy our mountains and our future while treating their workers as no better than peasants and serfs?


When a man embarks upon a crime, he is morally guilty of any other crime which may spring from it. Sherlock Holmes.

[ Parent ]
Workers of the world unite! (0.00 / 1)
You have nothing to lose but your chains.  

Sorry but I'm not ready to relegate the means of production to the state just yet.

VC


[ Parent ]
a few things (4.00 / 2)
1. A great deal of what these companies do is not legal. we have regulatory agencies run by industry shills who look the other way while they break the law. The W.Va. DEP simply isn't doing its job.

2. So what if is legal? So was segregation. it wasn't morally acceptable, either.

3. This organizers of this campaign have emphasized over and over that they are committed to non-violent civil disobedience, and have lived up to their word 100%. To make the stretch that they're going to burn down an office is either highly misinformed, intentionally dishonest - or both.  


[ Parent ]
take another look (0.00 / 1)
In response to 1. - not real sure what you are specifically talking about, but if you are aware of serious violations of federal law, then you have a potentially quite lucrative citizens law suit.  What facts do you have to substantiate this whole industry shill thing?  Was Mike Callaghan an industry shill? (Could be blasphemy on this site) Was Ms. Timmermeyer?  If they weren't then what makes Randy Huffman.  He isn't doing anything they were not.
2. So anything not morally acceptable is permissable to take illegal action against?  Guess you support those nut jobs who shoot abortion doctors then, huh?  In my opinion radical environmentalists are to the left what radical abortion protestors are to the right.
3.I'm pretty sure that I was clear in comparing the economic damage of burning something down to the just as real economic damage of lost wages and production but I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and not label you.
The Viscount

[ Parent ]
False comparison (4.00 / 1)
No one on the environmental side murdered anyone here. Talk about overblown comparisons.

When a man embarks upon a crime, he is morally guilty of any other crime which may spring from it. Sherlock Holmes.

[ Parent ]
here being the operative word (0.00 / 1)
I assume you remember the Unabomber - early environmental extremist.  The point is extremism that leads to thinking its okay to take matters into your own hands leads to violence in the end.
VC

[ Parent ]
vc - thanks you for engaging in a dialogue (4.00 / 1)
Can you please say more about this:

I think condemnation would be universal if these activists burned an office building down.  By stopping major mining equipment such as the dragline, they have committed just as much damage.

In what way is temporarily idling equipment for a few days "just as much damage" as permanently destroying an office building?

Let's say a citizen was successful in seeking a legal injunction (your preferred method of protest) to stop damaging mining before it happened. Let's say the end result was idling that exact same piece of equipment. Would that still be "just as much damage" as burning down an office building?

::

Correct me if I'm wrong, but putting two and two together, it sounds like you expect companies to be able to violate environmental regulations and if they happen to get caught to pay a small fine as a cost of doing business.

You know, there is plenty wrong with consistently violating the spirit and the letter of environmental regulations.

And, as a word of friendly advice... a big issue the coal industry has on its hands as new energy/climate legislation is written in Congress is: when coal companies resort to illegal activities they delegitimize your cause.


[ Parent ]
These are easy (0.00 / 1)
Clem,
If I am not mistaken Massey quoted a damage figure from the dragline event in the neighborhood of $300k.  I would assume that is labor cost, lost production, probably a few other things.  I don't have any idea if this is a legitimate number or not, but I know 10 years ago when a longwall used to go down, the cost of the downtime was assumed to be $400/minute, so you can see that it adds up quickly.  If the number is right, $300k is $300k no matter how you lose it.  That said the difference between this action and a legal challenge is obvious - its the legal part.  I may not like it if a judge rules against me, but that is the way our system works and at least an impartial (usually) judge looked at the facts and weighed the impacts on both sides.  That is a lot better than a well meaning kid from Florida deciding what I do is not morally acceptable and sitting in a tree and shutting me down.

On the second part, some of the violations are quite substantial, not just a part of doing business.  Also repeat DEP violations can lead to permit forfeiture which is a pretty effective deterrent.  I agree whole heartedly that coal companies have been their own worst enemy by not taking care of business and self policing.  Attitudes have changed considerably in the last several years.  Is there room for improvement? sure.  Are things better than they are portrayed to be?  In my opinion yes.
Thanks
The Viscount


[ Parent ]
thank you for the continued dialogue (4.00 / 1)
There's a number of fallacies in your comment.

I'm short for time at the moment, so I'll just tackle one quick one using the same frame of reference as your comment.

For kicks and giggles, please explain to me how the $300,000 from the dragline event would appear on an income statement, statement of cash flows, and on a balance sheet. Then explain how a $300,000 building burning would. (To keep things really simple let's ignore insurance coverage the company has for both events.)

I think you'll find there's a world of difference between a $300,000 managerial cost accounting allocation of opportunity cost and a $300,000 asset destruction cost. Just because the two numbers add up hardly makes them equivalent.

::

As to the value of civil disobedience and the morality of laws... are you aware that courts treated segregation as a legal practice in this country for a long time?


[ Parent ]
normally I at least somewhat agree with you (0.00 / 1)
but I don't on this one.  Whether I hold someone up at gun point and take their money or kidnap them, and make them miss a week of work, either way he has no cash and can't make the house payment and I would be responsible for the damage.

VC


[ Parent ]
that's the point (4.00 / 2)
It's not cash we're talking about. If you've not had a chance, you might find it enlightening to delve further into the differences between managerial and financial accounting.

That calculation for "lost production time" is managerial accounting. It's not real money out the door. It's a useful fiction to allocate a dollar amount to down time so managers feel a stronger incentive to manage company resources better.

If a $300K building is burnt down that's a resource that is gone forever. It's a real tangible asset that is destroyed. That asset will get written down on the balance sheet. (Balance sheet = financial accounting.)

Whether I hold someone up at gun point and take their money or kidnap them, and make them miss a week of work, either way he has no cash and can't make the house payment and I would be responsible for the damage.

You've now changed up the scenario. That wasn't your original point. Anyway, I'm game... :-)

The tree-sitters did not rob, kidnap or keep anyone from showing up to work. Don Blankenship was the one deciding whether or not to send Massey coal miners home without pay.

There's plenty of reclamation work Blankenship could have them do. Blankenship could have them do work with other equipment. Blankenship could pay them to watch safety videos and get all their certifications up to date. Blankenship could pay his employees to spend days doing service in the community.

After all, didn't Don just say:

We work every day to ensure the safety of our miners and we are committed to improving the quality of life in the communities where our members live and work.

Heck, Blankenship could even pay his employees just because it is the right thing to do--many employers take care of their employees through all sorts of unforeseen circumstances.


[ Parent ]
Premium Advertiser

blog advertising is good for you

Welcome!

( Home )
Menu

Click here to join!

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About
- About WVaBlue.com
- Send us news at wvablue@gmail.com
-  Subscribe in a reader

Advertisers


Support WVaBlue

Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Current CO2 level in the atmosphere

Proudly displaying the West Virginia Red, White, Blue, Green and Orange.

Join me at http://www.350.org


WVa Democrats
  • Sen. Jay Rockefeller
  • Sen. Joe Manchin III
  • Joe Manchin for Senate (2010/2012)
  • Rep. Nick Rahall (WV-03)
  • Secretary of State Natalie Tennant
  • Auditor Glen Gainer
  • Treasurer John Perdue
  • Agriculture Commissioner Gus Douglass
  • Attorney General Darrell V. McGraw
  • Senate President Earl Ray Tomblin, acting as Gov.
  • Declared Candidates
  • Jeff Kessler
  • John Perdue
  • Natalie Tennant
  • Earl Ray Tomblin
  • Rick Thompson

  • Copyright 2011 West Virginia Blue
    Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified.
    This site exists thanks to financial support from BlogPAC, dedicated volunteers and participation by members of this community. The views expressed at West Virginia Blue belong solely to their respective authors.
    Powered by: SoapBlox