West Virginia Blue
The Best Blogging Community in West Virginia
Democratic politics, progressive policies, the good life and free living in Wild, Wonderful West Virginia.
Big Daddy Sen. Robert C. Byrd

Senate Bill 614 Protects West Virginians

by: Calhouner

Mon Mar 15, 2010 at 20:57:48 PM EDT


( - promoted by Wabi-Sabi)

Clem failed to mention Senate Bill 614 in his most recent post.  This bill creates a more democratic PSC process and begins to protect the interests of all West Virginians when the WV Public Service Commission reviews the need for interstate transmission lines.  

Senate Bill 614, supported by the WV Environmental Council, Stop PATH WV and WV Citizens Against PATH, as well as thousands of citizens across West Virginia has just passed the 2010 West Virginia Legislature and is going to Governor Manchin for his signature.  The bill passed the WV Senate on a unanimous vote and the WV House of Delegates with only two voting against it.  The bill was amended three times, and the complete version of the final bill has not been posted on the Legislature Web site.  

Senate Bill 614 contained two main provisions.  The bill changes the way the West Virginia Public Service Commission handles applications for certificates of convenience and necessity for high voltage (over 200 kV) transmission lines.  

West Virginia law on these transmission projects had failed to require the PSC to give priority to the impacts of new lines on West Virginia citizens and consumers.  Senate Bill 614 remedies that problem by including these impacts in the list of impacts that the PSC must consider in these cases.  

Existing West Virginia law also did not require that land owners who are under threat of land seizure for power lines be given notice when power companies file their applications at the PSC.  Senate Bill 614 requires that all land owners within the power line's 2200-foot wide preferred construction corridor be given at least 30 days notice, by certified mail, that they have the right to intervene in the PSC case at least 30 days before the PSC sets a deadline for intervenors.  

In both recent power line cases involving the PSC-approved TrAIL line and the pending PATH line, many land owners were prevented from exercising their rights to intervene in PSC cases, because they only found out that their property would be affected after the PSC closed the cases to new intervenors.  Only intervenors can participate directly in decisions about whether the power line is needed or where it will be sited.  

Senate Bill 614 will protect West Virginia power consumers, land owners and citizens from the abuse suffered by land owners and rate payers as a result of the TrAIL power line that the PSC approved in 2008.  While the land owner protection provisions of the bill will not apply directly to the pending PATH case, the bill's other provision will influence presentation of evidence as the PSC considers evidence concerning PATH.

Calhouner :: Senate Bill 614 Protects West Virginians
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Calhouner (4.00 / 1)
Thanks for pointing that one out. I wonder why the WV Democratic party email left that one off.

Stranger things have happened, but it would seem odd for Gov. Manchin to veto something with such strong support in the legislature.


I won't speculate on the Democratic Party's (4.00 / 2)
motives.  I will say that the two parts of the state that led the way on this bill are often neglected in Charleston, the Eastern Panhandle and central WV, often referred to in Calhoun County as WV's black hole.

[ Parent ]
Perhaps 'cause the good ole boys weren't involved (4.00 / 2)
The existing power structure in the state (pun intended) - coal and its associated industries, such as electricity generation - didn't want it, and did work to kill it. But I think we caught them off guard, we concentrated on citizen protection in future high-voltage line cases (rather than trying to stuff the PATH genie back in the bottle), and we framed it, accurately, as common courtesy to landowners. Republicans, normally the friends of big business, appreciated the idea that this was a way to restrain abuse of eminent domain powers, while Democrats saw it as something for ordinary citizens. State Sen. John Unger described it as a "people's bill."

[ Parent ]
Premium Advertiser

blog advertising is good for you

Welcome!

( Home )
Menu

Click here to join!

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About
- About WVaBlue.com
- Send us news at wvablue@gmail.com
-  Subscribe in a reader

Advertisers


Support WVaBlue

Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Current CO2 level in the atmosphere

Proudly displaying the West Virginia Red, White, Blue, Green and Orange.

Join me at http://www.350.org


WVa Democrats
  • Sen. Jay Rockefeller
  • Sen. Joe Manchin III
  • Joe Manchin for Senate (2010/2012)
  • Rep. Nick Rahall (WV-03)
  • Secretary of State Natalie Tennant
  • Auditor Glen Gainer
  • Treasurer John Perdue
  • Agriculture Commissioner Gus Douglass
  • Attorney General Darrell V. McGraw
  • Senate President Earl Ray Tomblin, acting as Gov.
  • Declared Candidates
  • Jeff Kessler
  • John Perdue
  • Natalie Tennant
  • Earl Ray Tomblin
  • Rick Thompson

  • Copyright 2011 West Virginia Blue
    Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified.
    This site exists thanks to financial support from BlogPAC, dedicated volunteers and participation by members of this community. The views expressed at West Virginia Blue belong solely to their respective authors.
    Powered by: SoapBlox