West Virginia Blue
The Best Blogging Community in West Virginia
Democratic politics, progressive policies, the good life and free living in Wild, Wonderful West Virginia.
Big Daddy Sen. Robert C. Byrd

The era of cheap coal is over

by: Clem Guttata

Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 16:23:52 PM EST


By Clem Guttata

An important article came out in Nature magazine this week, in "The end of cheap coal" authors Richard Heinberg and David Fridley note that "new forecasts suggest that coal reserves will run out faster than many believe. Energy policies relying on cheap coal have no future." (Full article requires subscription; more coverage at Bloomberg.)

Here's the key summary from the article (emphasis mine):

World energy policy is gripped by a fallacy - the idea that coal is destined to stay cheap for decades to come. This assumption supports investment in 'clean-coal' technology and trumps serious efforts to increase energy conservation and develop alternative energy sources. It is an important enough assumption about our energy future that it demands closer examination.

There are two reasons to believe that coal prices are likely to soar in the years ahead. First, a spate of recent studies suggests that available, useful coal may be less abundant than has been assumed - indeed that the peak of world coal production may be only years away. One pessimistic study published in 2010 concluded that global energy derived from coal could peak as early as 2011.

Second, global demand is growing rapidly, largely driven by China. Demand rose modestly in the 1990s (0.45% per year), but since 2000 it has been surging at 3.8% per year. China is both the world's biggest producer of coal (40% of global production) and its biggest consumer. Its influence on future coal prices should not be underestimated.

Economic shocks from rising coal prices will be felt by every sector of society. Better data on global coal supplies is long overdue and energy policies that assume a bottomless coal pit need rethinking urgently.

What does this mean for us here in West Virginia?  

Clem Guttata :: The era of cheap coal is over
It means that major new investments in coal infrastructure, like a billion dollar coal-to-liquid plant or retrofitting of coal-fired electric plants with carbon capture and sequestration, are bad ideas.

Those investments would accelerate the use of coal, raise the price of coal even higher, and leave West Virginians with high-priced energy sources.

So-called clean coal does not make economic sense. As I've noted before:

West Virginia is going to run out of coal well before Wyoming and Montana do. When those "cleaner coal" plans get built in West Virginia and we run out of cheap coal, we're going to be stuck with either importing really expensive coal from WY/MT or abandoning those really expensive technology investments. Either way, we're looking at a horrible deal for West Virginia residential and commercial rate-payers. Talk about a jobs and quality of life killer.

What do the study authors recommend? First off, the "USGS should urgently complete a new national coal survey." That's a great idea. Public policy should be firmly grounded in reality, not pie in the sky projections.

Second, "Nations should immediately begin to plan for higher fossil-fuel prices and to make maximum possible investments in energy efficiency and renewable-energy infrastructure." Indeed.

USGS Chapter H Figure 11

It's not a question of if West Virginia will run out of coal to mine, it is a question of when. The era of cheap coal is over. It's time for West Virginia to use our remaining coal wealth to invest in what comes next.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Coal prices and AEP rate increase (4.00 / 1)
Remember this from March, 2009? AEP wants record-high utility rate increase

American Electric Power is expected to apply today for a 43 percent increase for its West Virginia customers.

The state Public Service Commission has to decide whether to approve the record-high rate increase for Appalachian Power and Wheeling Power.

AEP blames higher coal prices for the proposed rate increase.

They didn't get the 43%. Despite a tidy profit last quarter, they're asking for more:

Chafin, 'thousands' of citizens opposing AEP base rate hike

By KATE COIL   Bluefield Daily Telegraph  The Bluefield Daily Telegraph  Tue Nov 16, 2010

BLUEFIELD - Senate Majority Leader H. Truman Chafin, D-Mingo, has added his name to the list of those protesting Appalachian Power's proposed 13.98 percent base rate increase.

Chafin plans to attend the Public Service Commission hearing today on the base rate increase at the Public Service Commission building in Charleston at 6:30 p.m.

According to Chafin, he decided to oppose the rate increase after a petition and "thousands" of phone calls from constituents regarding power outages and rate increases

How does the company justify the rate increase? (Emphasis mine.)

Moye said the company requested the rate increase in order to compensate for fluctuating coal costs and environmental upgrades to AEP power plants. Moye also cited the company reduced its base rates in 2006.

Moye said a "one-time request" is also factored into the increase to recoup costs from winter storms in 2009. The request is not a part of the over all base rate, but was filed along with the base rate increase.

If accepted, the resident customer base rate will increase 17 percent with a 12 to 15 percent rate increase for commercial and industrial customers.



coal and electrical generation (4.00 / 1)
Other states are responding aggressively to the changing energy markets by reducing their dependence on coal-fired electricity.

Per the Institute for Energy Research:

In the electricity-generation market of 2009, coal generation had only a 44 .6 percent share, 3.6 percentage points lower than in 2008 and the lowest level since 1978 when it represented 44.2 percent of the market. Hydroelectric power, wind energy, and natural gas picked up most of the market share coal lost in 2009. Higher water levels helped lift hydroelectric generation, while wind and natural gas boosted their generation levels by adding capacity. Natural gas was also able to compete more effectively against coal, inasmuch as gas's price was about 50 percent lower in 2009 than in 2008.

West Virginia's continued reliance on coal as our predominant source of electricity puts us at a competitive disadvantage in relation to other states. As coal becomes more valuable in the global markets, West Virginia rate-payers are stuck paying for increasingly expensive coal plant capacity with even fewer commercial and industrial buyers to help share the load.

We ought to be figuring out how to start retiring coal plants by reducing our demand, not adding to the fuel stock requirements through major plant expansions.


We need sustainable energy production (0.00 / 0)
in WV and we can still market the carbon (coal) in it's raw form to be engineered into other more useful applications other than to burn it. All the necessary resources exist in WV to produce an All-WV photovoltaic module to sell on the east coast and export overseas. We can use abandoned strip mine sites, landfills, brownfields, et al to place renewable energy projects like wind and solar if appropriate.  We have many alternatives to burning coal we just need the leadership and political will to make it happen.

what's an example of this? (0.00 / 0)
I agree with everything else you said, but I'm confused by this:

we can still market the carbon (coal) in it's raw form to be engineered into other more useful applications other than to burn it.

What are uses of coal that don't involve releasing greenhouse gases?

(Also, it's a tall order to get the coal out of the ground in a way that doesn't do environmental damage.)

I'm against any major new coal infrastructure investments. It's inevitable we're going to be mining WV for a while as we wind down our coal-fired electrical plants. Lets get busy replacing them so in 10, 15, and 20 years we're not stuck having to import even more coal to Appalachia to pay through the nose for dirty electricity.


[ Parent ]
India is buying coal for metallurgical process--steel making (0.00 / 0)
not burning it for energy but still burning it.

Bridges and railroad tracks are steel. Office buildings, even LEED ones, are steel. I don't know whether the electric mini-mills vs the Bessemer process have decreased the use of coal in the steel industry or not without researching it. I have a few other things to look into right now.

NFTT: Support My Team or I Will Dance


[ Parent ]
steel (0.00 / 0)
Yes, agreed.

We still have metallurgical coal in WVa, but not nearly as much as there once was. And, now that most (all?) of the big steel plants are shut down in WV/PA, AFAIK the metallurgic coal is heading to China. (Anyone else have more details on that?)

Steel is a good example of using today's energy sources in a way that will last into the post-carbon future. Steel has long-term productive use that will out-last our remaining Appalachian coal. In addition to structural supports, steel siding also many positive characteristics (long life, low maintenance, good strength/weight ratio).

But, I don't think that's what JBdem4usa was referring to.


[ Parent ]
what WV legislature can do (0.00 / 0)
Energy efficiency pays for itself.

Can energy retrofit loans bring wonderful life to economy?

Projects That Pay For Themselves. While American families and businesses may have little ability to spend more right now, the opportunity to spend less makes sense.

Energy saving and renewable energy projects can more than pay for themselves by cutting the energy expenditures of households and businesses. Though they take up-front dollars to implement, a steady monthly stream of utility bill savings pays off the cost of the project.

An energy loan on good terms can convert the cost of the energy saving and renewable energy projects into a monthly payment that is less than the savings. The family budget improves from Day 1 of project completion.

Creating American Jobs. While these projects pay for themselves with the same money people are already spending on utility bills, energy saving projects are not a "wash" for American job creation, for four reasons:

1. More money is spent now, on the project, than current year utility bills.

2. Energy saving and renewable industries are more labor intensive.

3. Many fuels are imported from other countries.

4. Most energy-saving products such as caulk & insulation are USA made.

The customer saves money, and the project creates jobs. If there was ever a definition of a "no-brainer" you've-got-to-do-this idea, this is the one.

What's the legislature's role? Create a state fund to promote, subsidize and/or guarantee loans. They can also create programs to facilitate on-bill financing. (Follow the link above for more details.)

There's lots of ways the state government can facilitate the marketplace.


some carbon is still need in steel making (0.00 / 0)
the switch to the electric thin casting over the 1855 Bessemer process has reduced green house gases by 40%

even more recycling of scrap will increase the environmental benefit. makes me wonder what is the prevalent method of producing structural steel in china and india.

NFTT: Support My Team or I Will Dance


Premium Advertiser

blog advertising is good for you

Welcome!

( Home )
Menu

Click here to join!

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About
- About WVaBlue.com
- Send us news at wvablue@gmail.com
-  Subscribe in a reader

Advertisers


Support WVaBlue

Active Users
Currently 2 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Current CO2 level in the atmosphere

Proudly displaying the West Virginia Red, White, Blue, Green and Orange.

Join me at http://www.350.org


WVa Democrats
  • Sen. Jay Rockefeller
  • Sen. Joe Manchin III
  • Joe Manchin for Senate (2010/2012)
  • Rep. Nick Rahall (WV-03)
  • Secretary of State Natalie Tennant
  • Auditor Glen Gainer
  • Treasurer John Perdue
  • Agriculture Commissioner Gus Douglass
  • Attorney General Darrell V. McGraw
  • Senate President Earl Ray Tomblin, acting as Gov.
  • Declared Candidates
  • Jeff Kessler
  • John Perdue
  • Natalie Tennant
  • Earl Ray Tomblin
  • Rick Thompson

  • Copyright 2011 West Virginia Blue
    Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified.
    This site exists thanks to financial support from BlogPAC, dedicated volunteers and participation by members of this community. The views expressed at West Virginia Blue belong solely to their respective authors.
    Powered by: SoapBlox