The very public embarrassment of the Charleston Daily Mail

Charleston Daily Mail (0.00 / 0)

You're right about Surber. He's only half a man. L.T. Anderson described him best. Remember that one Surber?

---

by: kworkman @ Tue Jan 18, 2011 at 20:13:49 PM UTC

Tried to Comment (4.00 / 1)

I just tried to comment on the article (gave my name + email address as required) twice asking "ok. you don't want civil discourse.  What is the alternative?"  Both comments were rejected.

I guess Surber doesn't want a civil discourse AND doesn't want to provide an alternative.  Just wants to complain about having his free speech limited when he has a well read blog on one of the major in-state newspapers.

I'm tired of people complaining about having their free speech limited when they're the people running huge amounts of the media and speaking out all the time with little impediment.

---

by: DannyWV @ Wed Jan 19, 2011 at 19:08:11 PM UTC

DannyWV (4.00 / 1)

I honestly don't understand the mindset of people like him who wallow in an imagined misery and slights. It must really suck to be him.

When a man embarks upon a crime, he is morally guilty of any other crime which may spring from it. Sherlock Holmes.

---

by: Carnacki @ Wed Jan 19, 2011 at 19:21:56 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

In charge of everything all the time. (4.00 / 2)

Responsible for nothing ever.
Sam thin.
It's the authoritarian personality type.

Because remember, Al Franken calling Rush Limbaugh a "big fat idot" is worser than Poplawski shooting three Pittsburgh cops because Obama was going to take his guns away.

And the bomb packages on a MLK Parade route where "they" might have been on Monday are Nuttin' compared to turning your back on the Bush 43 motorcade on January 20, 2005 in a time of war.

Kwik. Bee. Chin.

NFTT: Support My Team or I Will Dance

---

by: CA Berkeley WV @ Thu Jan 20, 2011 at 05:32:27 AM UTC

[ Parent ]