West Virginia Blue
The Best Blogging Community in West Virginia
Democratic politics, progressive policies, the good life and free living in Wild, Wonderful West Virginia.
Big Daddy Sen. Robert C. Byrd

Don't Bow Down. Stand Up Together!

by: foxfoot

Thu Feb 24, 2011 at 20:14:47 PM EST


cross-posted from DailyKos

How is it that 2% of a population in a democratic nation can wage a successful class war against the other 98%?  This should be something of a paradox.  Why don't those 98% come together at election time and elect people who will defend their interests?  The corporate raiders should get routed every time.  It's just simple math.

One reason, of course, is that most Americans don't realize just how unequal things are and how stacked against them the deck really is.  That's an information problem. But I think we also have a major imagination problem.  Consider the case of Rich Hahan, a Wisconsite and former GM worker who was profiled in the New York Times a few days ago.

foxfoot :: Don't Bow Down. Stand Up Together!
Rich was an auto worker.  He was in a union.  He has been laid off.  He is probably in the bottom half of the 98% right now.  This is the kind of man who should be supporting the protesters in Madison right now.  This is the kind of man who should be calling out Governor Walker for what he is-an errand boy for big business.  But he's not.  He's siding with Governor Walker.  Why?

He says he still believes in unions, but thinks those in the public sector lead to wasteful spending because of what he sees as lavish benefits and endless negotiations.

"Something needs to be done," he said, "and quickly."

And this echoes what another Wisconsin resident, Cindy Kuehn had to say:

"Everyone else needs to pinch pennies and give more money to health insurance companies and pay for their own retirement," said Cindy Kuehn as she left Jim and Judy's Food Market in Palmyra. "It's about time the buck stops."

According to the Times, you see this sentiment echoed again and again.  The feeling basically is that "away from Madison, many people said that public workers needed to share in the sacrifice that their own families have been forced to make. "

This is divide and conquer at its worst.  Trick the people you are trying to oppress into oppressing themselves by having them turn on one another.  It's been going on for years.  Trying to drive a wedge between private and public sector employees is just its latest guise.  Playing racial and ethnic groups against one another is another favorite of the American upper classes.  Then there's the immigrant scare tactic.  It's those damned Irish-Germans-Poles-Italians-Chinese-Slavs-Mexicans that done took yer jobs!  This has been going on since America was founded!  

Use racism to and fear of foreigners to keep workers down.  Heck, use a planted "troublemaker" to make things turn violent and turn the public against them!  Well if we could overcome it in the 20's in West Virginia we ought to be able to overcome it in the 21st.

Yes, when times are tough, the top 2% asks you to blame everyone but them.  Why do we fall for it so often? I said above that it's a problem of imagination, and here is what I mean.

The Riches and Cindys of the world don't see very many of those top 2% around them on a daily basis.  In fact, for many people in this country right now, the lifestyles of rich and famous people are something that you only see on TV.  You don't actually see those people in line at the grocery store or the unemployment office with you.  You have no idea how they get their money so you think they must have "earned it."  You aren't aware of the intricate ways they scam the government and rig the game to take home millions and millions of dollars in taxpayer money.

You are very aware that this guy Bob down the street gets a small disability check even though his leg is now fine.  You know that you were downsized and now have a meager paycheck and no benefits but see that your neighbor Julie works at the County building and still has health insurance and benefits and days off now and then.  You know your step-sister just took out a couple thousand in government loans because she claims to be a "student" at the local community college but actually used the money to buy a big screen TV.  And you sit there and you think, "How dare they!  They're the reason my taxes are so high!  I'm out busting my ass and I've had to make do with a shitty life so they should to!"

It's much easier to get you to turn on the people you actually bump into now and then.  The people all around you.  The ones you can imagine because you don't have to imagine.  You see them.  You know them.  You might even have lunch with them sometimes.  And it's no fair that you've had to make sacrifices and they don't!

I've had this conversation with friends somewhat recently.  A friend of mine ranted and raved about people on welfare or disability or with nice government jobs saying "that must be nice!"  And I even granted for the moment, that despite how meager the resources are that are available to these people, I just said, "Okay, let's say that's a bad thing.  Why do you get so worked up about those people and not, say, the MILLIONS of dollars our county has given away to Cabela's to build a store hear?  Or the millions of dollars that go to private companies to build sports stadiums without demanding a share of those companies' profits?  Or why don't you get mad that most millionaires pay less in taxes because of all the loopholes than the guy working at the county building you're so pissed off about?"

I don't think she had an answer.  It may have been something like, "Well I don't know those people!"

And that's why this is an imagination problem.  If you could hold in your mind just how good things are for the wealthy right now in this country, if you could see them benefiting in every materially conceivable way off the decisions they've made to ship your jobs overseas or the decision to hire an illegal immigrant at way below minimum wage or to raise insurance premiums again so there's more money for bonuses at the end of the year-if you could see that clearly in your mind, wouldn't you be outraged?  

If you could see clearly the way these people, who already had millions of dollars, made a cool calculation that your suffering, your job loss, your layoff, your benefit cuts, your being left to foot the tax bill because they have paid-for politicians write them exemptions for everything, that these things they inflict on all the rest of us would have the effect of making them even richer, would you not be revolted?  Would you not be ready to revolt?  

If you could see that yacht sailing down the coast was paid for by ten workers losing their jobs, would you not seethe?  Would you not be pissed at them instead of at your brother and sister living on the same street?  Wouldn't you demand that these top 2% make some shared sacrifice knowing that all of the other sacrifices were made to make them wealthier in the first place?

And wouldn't it make you the angriest that not only have they been forcing you to sacrifice more and more for their riches, but that they have intentionally played you all one against the other to make it happen?  

Well that's what's going on.  The Walker tapes are just the latest piece of evidence.  The worst part of these tapes is that Walker doesn't even seem surprised.  He doesn't miss a beat when a rich billionaire says "let's plant some trouble makers."  Let's rig the game.  Let's divide them.  Let's get them going after one another.  Let's manipulate and fool and trick those poor dumb masses into giving us even more concessions!  The governor of the state of Wisconsin says "Yeah, we thought about doing that..."

People don't like to admit when they're wrong.  They don't like to think they've been fooled or tricked or duped.  But if you don't admit that you've been suckered, you're just going to get taken again and again.

It's time to quit being fools.  It's time to quit being suckers.  It's time we quit barking at whatever latest threat our corporate masters point us toward to keep the attention away from them.  It's time for the advertisers and professionals who make a little bit more than the rest of us to stop being collaborators at the master's table, doing the dirty work of the corporations for the first shot at table scraps.  Don't do their dirty work for them no matter what the benefits package.  Don't be a collaborator.  Don't be a scab.  Don't bow down to corporate interests.  Don't bow down to divide and conquer schemes.  

Stand in unity with your brothers and sisters.  Stand together with the immigrants whose lives are way worse than yours.  Stand together with the person with physical or mental illness who can't work the same long hours that you do.  Stand together with your public and private sector fellow workers who actually make this country go.  Stand together with people of every race and religion who are being held down by the top 2% just like you are.

Stand together, stand proud and stand strong.  And we, the people, will have a more perfect union.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Great post (4.00 / 1)


When a man embarks upon a crime, he is morally guilty of any other crime which may spring from it. Sherlock Holmes.

Thanks (0.00 / 0)
The DKos version has one of my favorite clips from Matewan embedded via YouTube.  Wouldn't let me do it here, or the code was wrong, or something.

[ Parent ]
Right on (4.00 / 2)
The thing is, we ALL deserve the benefits that our public workers, for now, at least, are receiving. The corporate powers that be want us all to be Walmart workers, bovine and just happy to chew the cud of a minimum wage, no benefits lifestyle. If we let them end collective bargaining for those that still have it, there is no end to what they'll do. They've broken us with their Wall Street games and they think they can have their way with us. NO WAY!

Beauty will save the world

Bread and Circuses (4.00 / 1)
I think that the big companies want to see just how little they have to give the rest of us and get away with it.  I think they've calculated that if they just make sure people aren't starving and have 24/7 mindless entertainment, most of them won't realize what is going on and will keep to themselves.  It's the bread and circuses strategy of the ancient Romans all over again.  This time, though, none of the poor can afford to go to our sports spectacles so they have to watch on TV.  

In some ways, I think the American worker has been hurt by the fall of communism.  Not that I want anything like Soviet or Cuban or any other old 20th century version of communism here, mind you.  But when communist rebellions were out there happening and we were terrified of the reds, American companies seemed willing to give in to lots of worker demands because they feared American labor becoming "radical."  Now it seems that capitalism is the only game in town, or at least it's portrayed that way here.  They're not worried about serious unrest or uprising so they squeeze the workers harder and harder.  I'd have to actually do more study to see how sound this admittedly off the cuff idea is, but I think there is something to it.


[ Parent ]
Public workers get less pay, more benefits (4.00 / 1)
We need to remember that, while public workers, on average, get better benefits, on average they get paid less in wages and salaries (for comparable jobs).  Public and private total compensation is about the same, just split differently.

When we say everyone should get better benefits, it encourages the (wrong) impression that public workers get a better deal.  Yes, everyone should have healthcare and a decent pension; we just need to be careful how we frame it.


[ Parent ]
Good point (0.00 / 0)
I think that this perception is aided by the fact that in a lot of places these days, there are no "comparable" private-sector jobs.  Especially here in the rust belt.  Other than doctors and lawyers, about the only professional jobs you can find are in government.  Heck, in some small towns you either work for the government or you work for Wal-Mart.

[ Parent ]
Environment Question (0.00 / 0)
Do the citizens of the states dealing with pollution and contamination from industries such as refineries and mining support the defunding of the EPA and attacks on the environment? Do they experience the effects of this pollution and do they support their representatives in congress.  I don't get it.  If I lived near a coal plant I might want someone monitoring the environmental impact.  What about when their children drink the water and people start getting cancer in these areas.  I just don't get it and would love to see some polls on this type of question.  Thank You!

Negative frames (4.00 / 1)
Been thinking a lot about this lately.  We are way better at talking about the negatives - ugly pictures of mountaintops, dead fish, kids with rotted teeth (remember the NY Times story of Coal River Valley water?), desolated coal towns, stories about too much cancer, diabetes, obesity - that no-one wants to look at, than picturing the benefits of government services and regulations.

As the post says, people have a hard time imagining what they can't see - not only can't they see the rich, they don't see the towns and cities across the country where people are healthier and happier.  

We need to paint those pictures. We need to work harder to frame the issues in positives - safe water, clean air, safe food and cars, more kids going to college, less crime, our parents with a decent living and medical care because of Social Security and Medicare.  People are way more likely to work for an easily pictured good thing than to avoid the threat of a bad thing.

There's a new post at The Pump Handle on the benefits of public health funding, specifically safe food - for corporations as well as people.

http://scienceblogs.com/thepum...


[ Parent ]
Coal mining is a complex issue (0.00 / 0)
But the regional media, and maybe even the national media, tends to paint it as a "for or against" coal.  Like the stupid "friends of coal" campaign.  As if coal miners, operators, and consumers all had the exact same interests.  And yes, the environmental and other impacts need to be taken into consideration.  But these are complex issues and TV gives you 30 seconds and print media is written at a fourth-grade level.  So...yeah.  I think I"m going to write something up on this.

[ Parent ]
Premium Advertiser

blog advertising is good for you

Welcome!

( Home )
Menu

Click here to join!

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About
- About WVaBlue.com
- Send us news at wvablue@gmail.com
-  Subscribe in a reader

Advertisers


Support WVaBlue

Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Current CO2 level in the atmosphere

Proudly displaying the West Virginia Red, White, Blue, Green and Orange.

Join me at http://www.350.org


WVa Democrats
  • Sen. Jay Rockefeller
  • Sen. Joe Manchin III
  • Joe Manchin for Senate (2010/2012)
  • Rep. Nick Rahall (WV-03)
  • Secretary of State Natalie Tennant
  • Auditor Glen Gainer
  • Treasurer John Perdue
  • Agriculture Commissioner Gus Douglass
  • Attorney General Darrell V. McGraw
  • Senate President Earl Ray Tomblin, acting as Gov.
  • Declared Candidates
  • Jeff Kessler
  • John Perdue
  • Natalie Tennant
  • Earl Ray Tomblin
  • Rick Thompson

  • Copyright 2011 West Virginia Blue
    Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified.
    This site exists thanks to financial support from BlogPAC, dedicated volunteers and participation by members of this community. The views expressed at West Virginia Blue belong solely to their respective authors.
    Powered by: SoapBlox